The U.S. Post Office: the Constitution’s odd nod to socialism
What does the Postal Power tell us about congressional delegation to administrative agencies?
The U.S. Post Office: the Constitution’s odd nod to socialism Read More »
What does the Postal Power tell us about congressional delegation to administrative agencies?
The U.S. Post Office: the Constitution’s odd nod to socialism Read More »
The Colorado Supreme Court has continued its demolition campaign against the Colorado Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) with a new
This column first appeared in The Hill on April 2, 2018. We are witnessing a renewal and quickening of a 50-year old campaign to dissuade
How the Campaign Against An Amendments Convention Got Started Read More »
New Hampshire was, and is, quite a small state, but its ratification was particularly significant.
New information on the Constitution’s ratification — Part III: Vermont Read More »
The Constitution says that “on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, [Congress] shall call
New Study: only one state away from a convention to propose a balanced budget amendment Read More »
New Hampshire was, and is, quite a small state, but its ratification was particularly significant.
New information on the Constitution’s ratification — Part II: New Hampshire Read More »
. . . if you want to apply the Founders’ own rules of interpretation to the Constitution, the understanding of the ratifiers is most important.
New information on the Constitution’s ratification — Part I: South Carolina Read More »
Each anti-TABOR court decision has become precedent for further anti-TABOR decisions.
Colorado’s Supreme Court has once again weakened taxpayers’ rights Read More »
An extra-constitutional action may be legal or illegal.
Unconstitutional? Extra-Constitutional? What’s the difference? Read More »
In 2015, I obtained the journal for still another convention of states: The convention that met in 1861 in Montgomery, Alabama.
The Montgomery Convention of 1861 Read More »
So what was the understanding in 1787-90? I have pieced this together over many years. In a nutshell, here it is:
Is Federal Infrastructure Spending Unconstitutional? Read More »
Opponents then — like their successors today — claimed they were protecting the Constitution. But what they actually were (and are) doing is protecting judges and politicians who abuse their positions by changing constitutional rules without following the normal democratic process.
How the False Stories Against An Amendments Convention Got Started Read More »