Their commitment to “democracy” reminds me of how they cheered when the Supreme Court overruled 30 consecutive state referenda to impose same-sex marriage on the country.
“Our Democracy” and the Sandbagging of Joe Biden Read More »
In light of the evidence, it is astounding that confusion over the Constitution’s categories of direct and indirect taxes still persists.
More Evidence that “Direct Taxes” include Levies on Wealth and Income Read More »
Those who live in the Real Colorado, like those in other Western states, share the individualism and traditional values the “progressive” crowd would delight to destroy.
Supreme Court Just Helped out the Real Colorado Read More »
“Progressives” advertise themselves as opposed to hate. Yet in my experience, some of them are very good haters.
What Rep. Woodrow’s nasty Trump post tells us about ‘progressives’ Read More »
Some commentators have been building on the prevailing uncertainty to argue that wealth taxes are indirect and therefore need not be apportioned.
Moore v. United States and the Uncertainty About “Direct” and “Indirect” Taxes Read More »
A law imposing a federal wealth tax would be unconstitutional unless the projected revenue was apportioned among the states by population.
Wealth Taxes and the Direct-Indirect Tax Controversy Read More »
Misunderstanding the Constitution’s term “direct tax” led the Supreme Court to erroneously uphold Obamacare. Next, it might lead to a new federal wealth tax.
Clearing Up the Confusion About the Constitution’s Term “Direct Taxes” Read More »
The Constitution’s crucial distinction between “direct” and “indirect” taxes was well-understood by the Founders, but due to lack of scholarly guidance the Supreme Court often has gotten the distinction wrong.
The Supreme Court Was Wrong About Taxes Read More »
Was Marshall really a model for liberal activist justices? Learn the truth in this audio series.
Learn About Chief Justice John Marshall from Rob Natelson’s New Audio Series Read More »
Biden’s statement on the Supreme Court immunity decision is provably false.
Correcting Biden’s False Statement on the Supreme Court’s Presidential Immunity Decision Read More »
The court reached the right conclusion, but it erred in two ways.
The Supreme Court’s Trademark Case and the First Amendment: Carrying History Too Far Read More »
The real significance of this case is that it tells us the notorious “Chevron doctrine” is on the way out.
