Chief Justice Roberts’s language may create confusion the next time a state has a contested presidential election.
The Highly Political and Misunderstood Case of Moore v. Harper Read More »
The current bench challenges administrative overreach, but not overreach by Congress.
Your Guide to This Year’s Constitutional Cases From SCOTUS, Part II Read More »
The Supreme Court issued both liberal and constitutionalist decisions.
Your Guide to This Year’s Constitutional Cases From SCOTUS — Part I Read More »
If it had been treated properly as a “freedom of the press” case, then whether designing was for business or personal purposes would have been irrelevant.
The “Christian Web Designer Case” Could Have Been Much Easier Read More »
This case undermined state control over its own property law and probably gave the property owner an undeserved benefit.
Tyler v. Hennepin County: Why This Seemingly Innocent Decision is Disquieting Read More »
A key part of the majority opinion seems to conflict with the majority opinion in an Indian law case decided just a few days earlier.
Arizona v. Navajo Nation: SCOTUS Zags Back Read More »
The Supreme Court has re-confirmed a key rule of constitutional amendment law.
The weaponization of institutions against conservative politicians is nothing new, but Trump, unlike others, has not learned how to counter it.
Here’s Why It Seems Trump is Always in Trouble Read More »
The Commerce Clause part of the decision is a mess. There is no more polite way to describe it.
The Supreme Court’s Confused Decision in Haaland v. Brackeen Read More »
Justice Clarence Thomas frequently uses concurring and dissenting opinions to explain the Constitution’s fundamental principles.
Justice Thomas’s Latest Dissent: The Constitution and Federal Spending Read More »
“Progressive” priorities are not about solving real problems. Rather, they center on degrading well-run First World locales into Third World hell-holes.
Another Case of “Government Failure:” Lefty Lakewood Ignores Anti-Noise Laws Read More »
Justice Alito’s majority opinion held that the phrase “waters of the United States” means only defined bodies of water—such as lakes and streams—and those wetlands that so border them that their waters’ surface merges with the surface of the lake or stream.
SCOTUS Curbs EPA: The Sackett Case Read More »
