Grover Cleveland belongs in the top 20 . . . Similarly, Calvin Coolidge should be in the top 20 . . . Lyndon Johnson belongs in the bottom five.
Using the Constitution to Re-Rank the Presidents Read More »
An advocate of vast congressional power takes quotes out of context, misrepresents what others say, and makes historical errors
A Preliminary Response to Prof. Ablavsky’s “Indian Commerce Clause” Attack Read More »
The hysteria has been matched only by the detractors’ astonishing constitutional ignorance.
The ‘Independent Legislature Doctrine’—and why it frightens many on the left Read More »
The Constitution does not give Congress authority to regulate the adoption of children.
Indian Child Welfare Act: Another case of Congress’s overreach goes to the Supreme Court Read More »
The Jan. 6 committee appears to have no more regard for the attorney-client privilege than for the Constitution’s Speech and Debate Clause.
The left’s attack on attorney-client confidentiality Read More »
The most important problem with the Electoral Count Act is that any law governing this “federal function” simply has no effect.
The Electoral Count Act Is Unconstitutional Read More »
The state and would-be “customers” interfering with [a religious] business model have no more constitutional standing than a thug who disrupts a church service or shouts down a speaker.
SCOTUS should uphold the right of religious people to refuse to serve the LGBT agenda Read More »
There’s only one coherent explanation for such programs, and that is political.
[The court should restore the Ninth Amendment. Enforcing it would not protect abortion . . . rather, it would reduce the federal government to its constitutional limits.
The male virtues are central to any well-functioning society.
War has a way of clarifying what’s important Read More »
States contemplating interposition usually should act in cooperation with other states. This essay outlines how methods of cooperation work.
How states can work together without the feds Read More »
Banks’ and Cawthorn’s accusers . . . are apparently ignorant of our constitutional traditions. They are also malicious . . . .
Can pro-Trump congressmen be disqualified as ‘insurrectionists?’ Read More »
