Abolish the CDC and NIH
We are reproducing this 2021 article, whose point is underscored by new revelations regarding the Anthony Fauci and federal health agencies.
Abolish the CDC and NIH Read More »
We are reproducing this 2021 article, whose point is underscored by new revelations regarding the Anthony Fauci and federal health agencies.
Abolish the CDC and NIH Read More »
The cases show that the Roberts court is committed to the case precedents through which the liberal 20th century justices re-wrote the Constitution.
How the media misrepresent our liberal-leaning Supreme Court Read More »
The court doesn’t have a “conservative majority.” In constitutional cases at least, it leans toward the liberal side.
The liberal Supreme Court: A review of the recent term Read More »
This is a rare case in which the liberal media’s imaginary “conservative Supreme Court majority” really showed up.
Supreme Court: property rights vs. labor unions Read More »
Even leading pro-choice scholars have acknowledged Roe’s defects.
Time for the Supreme Court to overrule Roe v. Wade Read More »
The most memorable opinion was written by Justice Gorsuch. In joining the majority, he reminded us that “Government is not free to disregard the First Amendment in times of crisis.”
Supreme Court curbs the COVID police Read More »
[T]he Texas case . . . raised important factual issues and crucial questions of constitutional law. But that’s not to say Texas should have won.
This case reflected an irony common these days: The majority the media calls “conservative” applying liberal precedent while the three most liberal justices argued against it!
New from the Supreme Court: A smashing victory for religious liberty Read More »
At the close of every annual court term, commentators express surprise that so many of the court’s decisions over the previous year have been liberal. They never make the simple deduction that if the court is producing so many liberal decisions, then perhaps it is not “conservative” after all.
Even with Amy Coney Barrett, we don’t really have a conservative Supreme Court Read More »
In Justice Barrett we have a two-fer. She offers geographic diversity . . . And she offers educational diversity.
The significance of the Amy Coney Barrett appointment Read More »
[T]he “progressives” have lost the argument over constitutional meaning. And that is why they have pivoted to assail the document itself.
The Left’s War on the Constitution Read More »
[T]he statements by Biden, Leahy, and Feingold are flatly incorrect. The current proceedings are neither “unconstitutional” nor “illegitimate” nor an attempt to “steal” anything.
Is the Nomination of Amy Coney Barrett Unconstitutional? Read More »