Another Federal Real Estate Screw-Up
One of the clearest messages from the American Founding was that the Constitution left regulation of private land within state boundaries […]
Another Federal Real Estate Screw-Up Read More »
One of the clearest messages from the American Founding was that the Constitution left regulation of private land within state boundaries […]
Another Federal Real Estate Screw-Up Read More »
It is often said that the Constitution should be interpreted according to its “original intent, “original understanding,” or “original meaning.”
Original Intent, Original Understanding, Original Meaning Read More »
You have to wonder how many other things the federal government will louse up before people demand a return to
The disastrous student loan mess Read More »
Very few people know that the Constitutional Convention of 1787 only the last of nearly 20 other conventions in which
New History of Founding Era Conventions Read More »
Proceeding on the very reasonable theory that the Founders knew what they were doing . . . Seth Barrett Tillman has spent considerable effort reconstructing the meanings of different office/officer phrases.
The Constitution’s officers Read More »
Every so often I’m asked whether the Founders anticipated judicial review. In other words, whether the Founders expected the courts
Did the Founders expect the Courts to Declare Laws Unconstitutional? Read More »
“A public office is a public trust”—common saying, but do we really believe it? The American Founders did. Most of
The Government as Public Trust—One Roman Emperor Showed It Is Feasible Read More »
Sometimes a convention for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution is referred to as a “constitutional convention.” That title is
Why an Amendments Convention is not a “Constitutional Convention” Read More »
The meaning of some of the Constitution’s 18th century terminology was lost during the 19th century, leading to widespread misunderstanding.
The Great Forgetting Read More »
We have just filed an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief with the Supreme Court arguing that (1) under
II files unique Supreme Court brief in Obamacare case Read More »
Are the detainment provisions of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act serious? Yes they are. This is a complicated area,
Are the detainment provisions of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act serious? Read More »
II is submitting not merely one, but two separate brief to the U.S. Supreme Court opposing Obamacare. One will show
II submits brief to protect states from Obamacare bullying Read More »