Should we interpret the Constitution so the feds can oversee everything affecting more than one state?
As the framers did with so many other decisions, in allocating authority between states and federal government they balanced competing values.
As the framers did with so many other decisions, in allocating authority between states and federal government they balanced competing values.
A leading Founder pointed out that authority to regulate commerce did not include power to compel it.
More evidence that the Obamacare insurance mandate was unconstitutional Read More »
Rebutting discredited charges against the Constitution and the Founders
Video: Rob Natelson rebuts falsehoods spread about our Constitution Read More »
Tax burdens are affected by factors other than nominal rates—factors such as allowable deductions, credits, and refunds. CC would abolish refunds payable in cash or tax credits, thereby raising Coloradans’ state tax burden substantially.
Ballot language abuse in Proposition CC Read More »
When weighing whether to impeach a sitting president, we consider how other presidents have acted. It is regrettable but true that many Presidents have routinely played fast and loose with the truth, acted incompetently, and used their office to attack political opponents.
What the Constitution says about impeachment Read More »
Judges have no special expertise in identifying or balancing social benefits and social losses. . . Their rules turned out to be flawed. One of their flaws is that they pushed down the standards for public discourse.
One reason public discourse is so vile: We’ve forgotten the 1st Amendment’s meaning Read More »
In fact . . . the claim that slaveholders adopted the Constitution is substantially false.
Why recent attacks on the Constitution are wrong Read More »
Ballot language abuse has become a Colorado scandal.
If you read enough Colorado Supreme Court TABOR opinions, you notice . . . motifs: (1) taxpayers always lose, (2) the court’s opinions are often evasive . . . , and (3) after creating an anti-TABOR precedent, the justices then stretch it to create even more anti-TABOR precedents.
Colorado Supreme Court rules against TABOR—Again! Read More »
For many members of Congress . . . almost their only job experience has been politics. They can hardly understand how the rest of us live.
How to reform our dysfunctional federal government Read More »
. . . [A]ctivities over which the Constitution granted the federal government little or no jurisdiction [included] social services . . . education, religion, real estate, local businesses, most roads and other infrastructure, nearly all criminal law matters, and most civil court cases.
How our Constitution was supposed to work: new evidence comes to light Read More »
The framers modeled the Electoral College on indirect election systems then prevailing in Scotland and Maryland, in which elector discretion was pivotal.
Independence Institute helps win court ruling protecting presidential electors Read More »