About birthright citizenship
Claims on both sides that the Constitution or case precedent clearly answer this question are not accurate.
About birthright citizenship Read More »
Claims on both sides that the Constitution or case precedent clearly answer this question are not accurate.
About birthright citizenship Read More »
This article first appeared at the Independence Institute Constitutional Studies website. Some alarmists are comparing an Article V convention to
Comparing an Article V Convention to a National Party Convention is Absurd Read More »
The Charter foreshadowed important provisions in the Bill of Rights.
Yet another constitutional precedent: a colonial charter from New York Read More »
In fact, the Constitution was the product of centuries of “guidelines.”
The Pilgrim Code of Law: one of many sources of our American Constitution Read More »
This article first appeared in Townhall.com. When Senator Susan Collins made her now-famous speech stating she would vote to approve
A spash of cold water: Kavanaugh probably won’t change much, but there are other options Read More »
The latest of a long line of conventions of states was held in September 12-15, 2017 in Phoenix, Arizona. It
Journal Now Available from the Latest Convention of States Read More »
Nineteen states attended, making it the second-largest convention of states in American history by number of states represented.
Journal now available from the latest Convention of States! Read More »
This article originally appeared in The Hill on July 17, 2018. Amid all the false claims distributed about the Constitution’s
Missouri court gets it right on constitutional amendment law Read More »
Trump-haters . . . should fix their hopes on impeachment, not on the 25th Amendment. For impeachment, though, you need a proven crime or a real breach of fiduciary duty. . . . Blind hatred and unproved allegations don’t count.
Hopes of using 25th Amendment against Trump are delusional Read More »
State constitutions written or favored by “progressives” also have been proclaimed under dubious circumstances.
. . . Those who adopted the Constitution understood that governance of recreational activities, such as sports, was reserved to the states. Regulation of in-state gambling, like other moral issues, similarly was outside the federal sphere.
New case shows the Supreme Court’s defense of constitutional federalism is only tepid Read More »
“The preambles of seven of the nine rescissions show they were based on material mistakes of law and fact.
Are recent “rescissions” of Article V applications valid? Read More »