First In a Series: John Dickinson Comes Into Prominence
This year marks the 250th anniversary of one of the most influential series of writings in American history.
First In a Series: John Dickinson Comes Into Prominence Read More »
Rights for a River? An Effort to Undermine Democracy and Make the Law Unfair
The unstated goal is to change the balance of power among humans—and to undermine democracy and the rule of law.
Rights for a River? An Effort to Undermine Democracy and Make the Law Unfair Read More »
John Dickinson’s ‘Farmer’ Letters on Their 250th Anniversary
The Farmer letters went well beyond asserting the case against taxation without representation; they also helped clarify American constitutional thinking on other questions, including: Which government responsibilities should be exercised centrally and which locally?
John Dickinson’s ‘Farmer’ Letters on Their 250th Anniversary Read More »
Why removing historical monuments is a bad idea
[B]ecause almost everyone conforms in most respects to prevailing social practices, disqualification for such conduct is necessarily arbitrary and driven more by politics than by merit.
Why removing historical monuments is a bad idea Read More »
State protection for citizen rights should temper ‘local control’
So when is local control good in reality rather than merely as a slogan?
State protection for citizen rights should temper ‘local control’ Read More »
A Response to a “Living Constitutionalist”
. . . law professors often corrupt their understanding of the Constitution with their own political preferences. . .
A Response to a “Living Constitutionalist” Read More »
How a ‘convention of states’ could tweak the Constitution
Representatives of state legislatures from across the nation will converge in Phoenix, Arizona on Sept. 12 to participate in a
How a ‘convention of states’ could tweak the Constitution Read More »
Part II: What Can We Do About Legal Realism and Its Promotion of Judicial Activism?
. . . the problem centers in specific institutions: American law schools and the higher reaches of the judiciary.
Part II: What Can We Do About Legal Realism and Its Promotion of Judicial Activism? Read More »
Part I: Judicial activism: Here’s a core reason for it you’ve never heard about
The Founders erected the American legal system to operate in the context of Anglo-American judicial values. The rules placed expressly or implicitly in the Constitution . . . were designed to operate in that context. However, the context changed.
Part I: Judicial activism: Here’s a core reason for it you’ve never heard about Read More »
Drafting a Balanced Budget Amendment: It’s tougher than you might think
Of course, it is one thing to criticize, but another to try to craft something better.
Drafting a Balanced Budget Amendment: It’s tougher than you might think Read More »
If you want to win a Supreme Court case, it helps to play to “progressive” values
Observe how many of the Left’s ideological buttons the plaintiff’s lawyers pushed: non-profit, recycling, mandatory government fee, poverty, disabilities, environment—and that interminably-overused mantra: community.
If you want to win a Supreme Court case, it helps to play to “progressive” values Read More »
With due respect to the Supreme Court, some campaign finance laws are unconstitutional
But Citizens United included a second decision, one rarely mentioned. In this part of the case, the court upheld federal laws requiring contributors to political ads to publicly reveal their names. Unlike the first ruling, the second was a constitutional mistake. Although the court has since reaffirmed its position, it should promptly reconsider.
With due respect to the Supreme Court, some campaign finance laws are unconstitutional Read More »