Anti-TABOR lawsuit almost gone, and it’s about time
This article originally appeared in the Denver Post. The 2011 federal lawsuit to void the Colorado Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights […]
Anti-TABOR lawsuit almost gone, and it’s about time Read More »
This article originally appeared in the Denver Post. The 2011 federal lawsuit to void the Colorado Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights […]
Anti-TABOR lawsuit almost gone, and it’s about time Read More »
This article originally appeared in The American Spectator The Supreme Court recently stepped back from its campaign to impose its
Legislative Reapportionment: The Supreme Court Steps Back Read More »
In 2014 the first legal treatise ever on the Constitution’s amendment process was published: Prof. Rob Natelson’s work, State Initiation of
The 4th Edition of Prof. Natelson’s Article V Treatise Is Now Here!! Read More »
This article first appeared in the Forth Worth Star Telegram. A silver lining to the withdrawal of Sen. Ted Cruz,
Cruz Withdrawal Postpones “Natural Born” Issue Read More »
Because of widespread interest in the Article V Information Center’s report on the legality of the “Compact for America” approach to
The Wisconsin Historical Society publishes successive volumes of the Documentary History of the Constitution of the United States. As its
Newly-Published Ratification Documents Confirm Our Conclusions on the Amendment Process Read More »
This article was first published by CNSNews. In an earlier post, I pointed out that the usual academic rankings of
Ranking the Presidents Using CONSTITUTIONAL Factors Rather than Liberal Politics Read More »
This article was first posted at CNS News. I recently watched an academic panel on C-SPAN devoted to “The Worst
Measuring Good and Bad Presidents: Why Academic Historians Are Wrong Read More »
I expected this book, written by Dinesh D’Souza and published by Broadside Books, to be bitter. For one thing,
II’s Article V Information Center has just issued a law report concluding that the “Compact for America” approach to amending the Constitution is, unfortunately, almost wholly unconstitutional.
Was the Supreme Court right to call Obamacare’s insurance penalty a “tax?”
Article V of the Constitution states that “The Congress . . . on Applications of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments.”
What is an Amendments Convention “Application?” What is a “Call?” Read More »