When I first heard about King v. Burwell, the latest Obamacare controversy before the U.S. Supreme Court, I assumed it […]
King v. Burwell: The Latest Obamacare Mess at the Supreme Court Read More »
Betty Natelson, my wife, has just published a new book—for readers 9 years and up—about the biblical heroine Deborah. Deborah
New Book About How Deborah—Judge and Biblical Heroine—Freed Israel From Terrorism! Read More »
Article V scholar and former House of Representatives legal counsel Mike Stern has just written a response to the irresponsible
Mike Stern Rebuts Claim that "Congress Would Control an Amendments Convention" Read More »
This article was first published at the American Thinker website. Many commentators and politicians have attacked the Supreme Court’s 2010
New Study Shows Campaign Disclosure Rules Violate First Amendment Read More »
Chief Justice John Marshall (in office 1801-1835) is often identified with an expansive “big government” interpretation of the Constitution. Fans
Chief Justice John Marshall: Not the Big Government Guy You Might Think Read More »
One of the far-fetched arguments used to persuade conservatives to oppose an amendments convention is that if 34 states apply,
Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 (I-10-3) of the Constitution forbids states from imposing any “Duty of Tonnage” without the
As the likelihood of a Convention for Proposing Amendments increases, people are beginning to adjust to the idea. A recent
New U.S. House Rule: A Hopeful Sign for an Amendments Convention Read More »
Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution reads as follows: The Congress shall have Power To lay and
What is an “Excise?” Read More »
The latest tactic in Article V opponents’ game of “Whac-A-Mole”* is the circulation of an article 23 years out of
Article V Opponents Now Peddling Article 23 Years Out of Date Read More »
Some people have asked for further clarification on why the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause does not grant Congress power
Update on Article V and the Necessary and Proper Clause Read More »
The Constitution requires the President to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” This “take Care” language came from
Is Obama Violating the “Take Care” Clause? Read More »
