Groups opposed to calling an Article V convention often cite an old letter written by the late Chief Justice Warren […]
What About that Warren Burger Letter Against An Article V Convention? Read More »
Law professors are overwhelmingly left-of-center, and they spend an undue amount of time trying to justify nearly unlimited federal power.
Just to show you that hypocrisy is alive and well in Washington, D.C. (as if you didn’t know), Title V
Supreme Court’s Obamacare Decision Renders Federal “Tort-Reform” Bill Unconstitutional Read More »
Some alarmists are comparing an Article V convention to the Republican and Democratic National Conventions. The argument is that an
Comparing an Article V Convention to a National Party Convention is Absurd Read More »
In 1988, Oxford University Press published Russell Caplan’s book Constitutional Brinksmanship. It revealed some of the extensive history behind the
Who Says History is Relevant to Article V? Well, the U.S. Supreme Court, For One! Read More »
Two stories in today’s Denver Post show how cynically the mainstream media are playing the story about what they misleadingly
Hear Justin Longo’s interview with Rob on Amendment 66. Colorado’s Amendment 66—the billion dollar tax hike—is a constitutional monstrosity. Amendment
Colorado's Billion-Dollar Tax Hike Proposal: Really Bad Constitution-Writing Read More »
A new book, edited by Professor Neil H. Cogan, has just been issued in which well-known constitutional scholars from across
Madison and the Amendments Convention: A New Chapter in a Brand New Book Read More »
Some constitutional scholars believe state applications for a convention for proposing amendments may limit the convention to voting “yes” or
Listen to Mark Levin’s interview of Rob here. (Go to Aug. 29 podcast, and fast forward to minute 55.) This
Freedom and popular government in Britain and America became possible because over the course of many years the House of
And You “Can’t” Defund Obamacare . . . Why? Read More »
Some political activists argue for repeal of the 17th amendment. In other words, they want to end popular elections of
The Problems With Repealing the Direct Election of Senators/17th Amendment Read More »
