There is no Supreme Court authority higher than [Chief Justice] Marshall, and he himself told us that “health laws of every description” are matters for determination by the states.
Mr. President, Do the right thing: End the unconstitutional vaccination mandate Read More »
The Supreme Court finally declined to privilege a pro-abortion litigant. Instead, it applied the sort of common-sense standard it would apply to any other legal dispute.
Abortion: The truth about the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Texas Heartbeat Act Read More »
The 25th amendment is seriously ambiguous. It creates uncertainties that discourage using its procedure.
Understanding the Constitution: Can the 25th amendment be used to remove Biden? Read More »
Our greatest chief justice was clear: Health regulations are for the states alone.
Chief Justice John Marshall: The feds have no power over your health care! Read More »
Those rights liberals favor are placed in, as the Supreme Court expresses it, a “preferred position.” The rights favored by everyone else can be more readily trampled.
The courts go AWOL on the virus vax Read More »
Here’s the most important underlying cause of the fires: federal land ownership.
These orders, federal and state, and not merely unconstitutional. They are fundamentally anti-constitutional. They are at war with a fundamental reason the Constitution was adopted.
Tenant eviction moratoria are more than unconstitutional; they’re insurrectionary Read More »
The term “the people” was not, as sometimes claimed, limited to wealthy white males.
Understanding the Constitution: the force of the Preamble Read More »
Gouverneur Morris had been educated in Greek and Latin poetry, but in composing the preamble he wisely adopted meter appropriate to English. He heightened the effect with alliteration and near rhymes.
Understanding the Constitution: the style of the preamble Read More »
If the plaintiffs actually do uncover systematic efforts by the Biden administration and other Democratic officeholders to suppress freedom of speech and freedom of the press, this will be the most egregious abuse-of-power scandal in recent times.
Twitter v. Trump, Part 3: Trump’s best ‘free speech’ claim against Twitter Read More »
So, the theory goes, if Congress invited Twitter to exercise political censorship, then Congress violated the First Amendment. But this theory also has weaknesses . . . .
Trump v. Twitter, Part 2: Can a private company violate the First Amendment? Read More »
Social media’s power to censor must be exercised only to empower parents in protecting their children. . . . . It’s not a license for a company’s civic ignoramuses to impose their political prejudices on the rest of us.
Trump v. Twitter, Part 1: How social media censors abuse federal law Read More »
