The “woke” media smears of Sidney Powell
“I have never met Powell and have no particular attitude toward her, positive or negative. But professional journalists should treat everyone fairly.”
The “woke” media smears of Sidney Powell Read More »
“I have never met Powell and have no particular attitude toward her, positive or negative. But professional journalists should treat everyone fairly.”
The “woke” media smears of Sidney Powell Read More »
Controlling the border is a constitutional mandate, not an option
Biden and Harris flout constitutional immigration duties Read More »
The charge that the Constitution is “vague” is based on ignorance.
Defending the Constitution: The founders’ words were not ‘meaningless’ or ‘vague’ Read More »
Even leading pro-choice scholars have acknowledged Roe’s defects.
Time for the Supreme Court to overrule Roe v. Wade Read More »
A final reason for decentralization is much less widely understood: Political decentralization promotes human progress.
Defending the Constitution: limits on federal authority Read More »
This election irregularity is the elephant in the room the media pretend not to see.
The undeniable irregularity that may have cost Trump the election Read More »
Obviously she was never taught the difference between ordinary legislation (such as traffic laws) and a general constitutional standard.
Defending the Constitution: The 2nd Amendment is not outdated Read More »
“In practice, “living constitutionalism” converts our Constitution into a parchment loin cloth to cover political pudenda.”
Defending the Constitution from the ‘living constitutionalists’ Read More »
The overwhelming majority of the framers had been given full authority to propose a new government. Charges that they did not are based on ignorance.
Defending the Constitution: The Framers did not violate their trust Read More »
Before criticizing the Founders, w]e must understand the choice they faced: (1) tolerating a vile institution that was (then) dying anyway or (2) consigning the American continent to perpetual warfare at a cost of millions of lives and incalculable misery.
Defending the Constitution: Why the Founders couldn’t abolish slavery Read More »
If you assume that counting persons is the proper basis for congressional representation, it’s easy to see how one could misread the reduction for slaves and the exclusion of non-tax-paying Indians as expressions of racism. However, many, probably most, of the framers did not think counting persons was the proper basis for representation.
Defending the Constitution: The ‘Three-Fifths Compromise’ was not based on racism Read More »
Even today, despite all the state legislative cessions, the authority available to state lawmakers remains impressive.
The federal powers of state legislatures Read More »