Should we interpret the Constitution so the feds can oversee everything affecting more than one state?
As the framers did with so many other decisions, in allocating authority between states and federal government they balanced competing values.
As the framers did with so many other decisions, in allocating authority between states and federal government they balanced competing values.
A leading Founder pointed out that authority to regulate commerce did not include power to compel it.
More evidence that the Obamacare insurance mandate was unconstitutional Read More »
Rebutting discredited charges against the Constitution and the Founders
Video: Rob Natelson rebuts falsehoods spread about our Constitution Read More »
When weighing whether to impeach a sitting president, we consider how other presidents have acted. It is regrettable but true that many Presidents have routinely played fast and loose with the truth, acted incompetently, and used their office to attack political opponents.
What the Constitution says about impeachment Read More »
In fact . . . the claim that slaveholders adopted the Constitution is substantially false.
Why recent attacks on the Constitution are wrong Read More »
For many members of Congress . . . almost their only job experience has been politics. They can hardly understand how the rest of us live.
How to reform our dysfunctional federal government Read More »
. . . [A]ctivities over which the Constitution granted the federal government little or no jurisdiction [included] social services . . . education, religion, real estate, local businesses, most roads and other infrastructure, nearly all criminal law matters, and most civil court cases.
How our Constitution was supposed to work: new evidence comes to light Read More »
The framers modeled the Electoral College on indirect election systems then prevailing in Scotland and Maryland, in which elector discretion was pivotal.
Independence Institute helps win court ruling protecting presidential electors Read More »
Ironically, by adopting the term “red flag law,” promoters inadvertently admitted their real motive is not safety. This is because the phrase “red flag law” has been proverbial for an enactment masquerading as a safety measure but really passed for more sinister reasons.
“Red flag law”—Historically the phrase means a deceptive law not about “safety” at all! Read More »
This new article presents even more evidence on how the federal government was supposed to be limited.
How the Founders told us the Constitution would restrict federal power Read More »
By clarifying constitutional amendment law, Stevens made it more accessible to citizens who now seek to use it to cure our dysfunctional federal government.
John Paul Stevens’ greatest legacy Read More »
NPV enables Democrats and Left-leaning activists to control a state merely by running up vote totals in a few counties or regions.
How the Left dominates states through “National Popular Vote” Read More »