The Fascinating Supreme Court Opinions in the Vaello Madero Case
Justice Thomas punctured a judicial balloon and Justice Gorsuch issued his own sizzling opinion.
The Fascinating Supreme Court Opinions in the Vaello Madero Case Read More »
Justice Thomas punctured a judicial balloon and Justice Gorsuch issued his own sizzling opinion.
The Fascinating Supreme Court Opinions in the Vaello Madero Case Read More »
Far from authorizing more federal power, amendments almost certainly will reduce federal prerogatives and edge us toward decentralization.
Are constitutional amendments coming? Read More »
Any lady may travel alone, from one end of the United States to the other, and be certain of the courteous and considerable treatment everywhere — America as it used to be, according to Charles Dickins
Truth and Tradition: Reflections on the Motto of a Great Newspaper Read More »
Grover Cleveland belongs in the top 20 . . . Similarly, Calvin Coolidge should be in the top 20 . . . Lyndon Johnson belongs in the bottom five.
Using the Constitution to Re-Rank the Presidents Read More »
An advocate of vast congressional power takes quotes out of context, misrepresents what others say, and makes historical errors
A Preliminary Response to Prof. Ablavsky’s “Indian Commerce Clause” Attack Read More »
The hysteria has been matched only by the detractors’ astonishing constitutional ignorance.
The ‘Independent Legislature Doctrine’—and why it frightens many on the left Read More »
The Constitution does not give Congress authority to regulate the adoption of children.
Indian Child Welfare Act: Another case of Congress’s overreach goes to the Supreme Court Read More »
The Jan. 6 committee appears to have no more regard for the attorney-client privilege than for the Constitution’s Speech and Debate Clause.
The left’s attack on attorney-client confidentiality Read More »
The most important problem with the Electoral Count Act is that any law governing this “federal function” simply has no effect.
The Electoral Count Act Is Unconstitutional Read More »
The state and would-be “customers” interfering with [a religious] business model have no more constitutional standing than a thug who disrupts a church service or shouts down a speaker.
SCOTUS should uphold the right of religious people to refuse to serve the LGBT agenda Read More »
There’s only one coherent explanation for such programs, and that is political.
[The court should restore the Ninth Amendment. Enforcing it would not protect abortion . . . rather, it would reduce the federal government to its constitutional limits.