The Great John Marshall, Part 3
There has been a effort in the law schools—and at times in the Supreme Court—to appropriate Marshall as a model for liberal activism.
The Great John Marshall, Part 3 Read More »
Alexander Hamilton, Richard Hooker, and the Necessary and Proper Clause
Alexander Hamilton may have borrowed part of his Necessary and Proper Clause analysis from a famous English theologian.
Alexander Hamilton, Richard Hooker, and the Necessary and Proper Clause Read More »
The “Nondelegation” Doctrine and the Necessary and Proper Clause
The scope of permissible delegation must be determined from the text of each power and the surrounding context. But there is no need to insert the Necessary and Proper Clause into the equation, except as a useful reminder.
The “Nondelegation” Doctrine and the Necessary and Proper Clause Read More »
Scholar Finds that Congress’s Power over Amendments Conventions is Strictly Limited
Dr. Wieciech is to be commended for examining an important constitutional issue and arriving at generally well-based conclusions.
Scholar Finds that Congress’s Power over Amendments Conventions is Strictly Limited Read More »
Will the Supreme Court stretch the Commerce Clause even more?
Some claim that when the word “Commerce” is applied to Native Americans, it magically balloons in scope, allowing Congress to regulate just about anything.
Will the Supreme Court stretch the Commerce Clause even more? Read More »
Mr. President, Do the right thing: End the unconstitutional vaccination mandate
There is no Supreme Court authority higher than [Chief Justice] Marshall, and he himself told us that “health laws of every description” are matters for determination by the states.
Mr. President, Do the right thing: End the unconstitutional vaccination mandate Read More »
Defending the Constitution: The founders’ words were not ‘meaningless’ or ‘vague’
The charge that the Constitution is “vague” is based on ignorance.
Defending the Constitution: The founders’ words were not ‘meaningless’ or ‘vague’ Read More »
New evidence on the meaning of the Necessary and Proper Clause
“. . . .the powers of this Congress are confined to what is expressly delegated to them”
New evidence on the meaning of the Necessary and Proper Clause Read More »
First decision of the Supreme Court Term: a unanimous liberal result
The statute is based on an overly-expansive definition of congressional power . . . But no member of the court wrote a concurring opinion to point that out . . .
First decision of the Supreme Court Term: a unanimous liberal result Read More »
What Does the Constitution Say About Federal Land Ownership?
The “Bundy stand-off” in Oregon at a federal wildlife refuge has triggered (or, rather, re-triggered) questions about the constitutionality of
What Does the Constitution Say About Federal Land Ownership? Read More »
The Impending Convention for Proposing Amendments — Part IV
Note: This series of six articles originally appeared in the Washington Post’s “Volokh Conspiracy,” a leading constitutional law website. Parts
The Impending Convention for Proposing Amendments — Part IV Read More »
The Necessary and Proper Clause Grants Congress No Power
In a recent post, I pointed out that, despite superficial appearances, the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause—clarifying that Congress has
The Necessary and Proper Clause Grants Congress No Power Read More »