Part #4: What’s Wrong with the Universities, and How to Fix It
Getting the feds out is probably the single most important step toward curing our universities.
Part #4: What’s Wrong with the Universities, and How to Fix It Read More »
Getting the feds out is probably the single most important step toward curing our universities.
Part #4: What’s Wrong with the Universities, and How to Fix It Read More »
When the court believes that even its modern version of the Constitution doesn’t support a federal exercise of power, it nevertheless may uphold that exercise under the doctrine of inherent sovereign authority.
Federal Power Outside the Constitution? Read More »
No responsible court should hear such a case, and no responsible lawyer should bring it.
Some Reasons Why Lawsuits to Disqualify Trump Will Fail Read More »
Constitutional writers have long understood the meaning of the terms “Treason,” “Bribery,” and high Crimes.” But the phrase “high Misdemeanors” was a subject of controversy.
Constitution’s Impeachment Rules Require Biden Inquiry to Be Narrowly Focused Read More »
Chief Justice Roberts’s language may create confusion the next time a state has a contested presidential election.
The Highly Political and Misunderstood Case of Moore v. Harper Read More »
The Supreme Court issued both liberal and constitutionalist decisions.
Your Guide to This Year’s Constitutional Cases From SCOTUS — Part I Read More »
If it had been treated properly as a “freedom of the press” case, then whether designing was for business or personal purposes would have been irrelevant.
The “Christian Web Designer Case” Could Have Been Much Easier Read More »
This case undermined state control over its own property law and probably gave the property owner an undeserved benefit.
Tyler v. Hennepin County: Why This Seemingly Innocent Decision is Disquieting Read More »
The Commerce Clause part of the decision is a mess. There is no more polite way to describe it.
The Supreme Court’s Confused Decision in Haaland v. Brackeen Read More »
Justice Clarence Thomas frequently uses concurring and dissenting opinions to explain the Constitution’s fundamental principles.
Justice Thomas’s Latest Dissent: The Constitution and Federal Spending Read More »
Justice Alito’s majority opinion held that the phrase “waters of the United States” means only defined bodies of water—such as lakes and streams—and those wetlands that so border them that their waters’ surface merges with the surface of the lake or stream.
SCOTUS Curbs EPA: The Sackett Case Read More »
The justices unanimously ruled that keeping the entire tax-sale proceeds was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court’s New Decision on ‘Taking Property’ Read More »