The state and would-be “customers” interfering with [a religious] business model have no more constitutional standing than a thug who disrupts a church service or shouts down a speaker.
SCOTUS should uphold the right of religious people to refuse to serve the LGBT agenda Read More »
[The court should restore the Ninth Amendment. Enforcing it would not protect abortion . . . rather, it would reduce the federal government to its constitutional limits.
States contemplating interposition usually should act in cooperation with other states. This essay outlines how methods of cooperation work.
How states can work together without the feds Read More »
Banks’ and Cawthorn’s accusers . . . are apparently ignorant of our constitutional traditions. They are also malicious . . . .
Can pro-Trump congressmen be disqualified as ‘insurrectionists?’ Read More »
Right now—while pandemic mistakes are fresh in our minds—is the time to adopt legal reforms to ensure those mistakes don’t happen again.
Never Again! Reforms to prevent future pandemic overreach Read More »
It is perverse to spend so much [constitutional law] class time on areas of recurrently-shifting jurisprudence, while neglecting constitutional principles that are just as central and far more enduring.
This series explains THE central event in the conversion of a constitutional federal government into the present unlimited “monster state.”
1937-1944: How the Supreme Court Re-wrote the Constitution – the Complete Series Read More »
If Biden truly cared about judicial diversity, instead of ruling out males and non-blacks, he’d rule out Harvard and Yale.
Biden’s pool of potential SCOTUS nominees hurts diversity rather than promotes It Read More »
“The Hill” offers the latest example of outrageous pro-establishment media bias—publishing false information about the citizens’ constitutional amendment process, and then refusing either a correction or a response.
Mainstream media disinformation — the new case of “The Hill” Read More »
Congress could impose income taxes before the 16th amendment.
Understanding the Constitution: Income taxes, other taxes & the 16th Amendment Read More »
Why Justice Scalia was right about textualism for statutes, but wrong about textualism for the Constitution.
Understanding the Constitution: Strict Construction, Textualism, and Originalism Read More »
The court should have dismissed this lawsuit immediately . . . .[But] we at Colorado’s Independence Institute took it very seriously. We anticipated that unscrupulous liberal jurists might seize on it as a way to destroy TABOR.
Federal court dismisses anti-TABOR lawsuit Read More »
