Audio: No, the Constitution is not racist—and never was.
This audio corrects myths about the Founders’ attitudes toward slavery and the purpose of the “three-fifths compromise.”
Audio: No, the Constitution is not racist—and never was. Read More »
This audio corrects myths about the Founders’ attitudes toward slavery and the purpose of the “three-fifths compromise.”
Audio: No, the Constitution is not racist—and never was. Read More »
If you assume that counting persons is the proper basis for congressional representation, it’s easy to see how one could misread the reduction for slaves and the exclusion of non-tax-paying Indians as expressions of racism. However, many, probably most, of the framers did not think counting persons was the proper basis for representation.
Defending the Constitution: The ‘Three-Fifths Compromise’ was not based on racism Read More »
Note: This was originally a four-part series published at the leading constitutional law website, “The Volokh Conspiracy,” which is affiliated
The Constitution's Financial Terms Read More »
Several readers sent me for comment a lengthy cover article in Time Magazine by managing editor Richard Stengel. Stengel’s piece
Time Mag’s Constitutional Baby Babble Read More »