Saving America and election integrity: 3rd in a series
2020 election irregularities: “For the survival of the republic, we cannot sweep such evidence under the rug.”
Saving America and election integrity: 3rd in a series Read More »
2020 election irregularities: “For the survival of the republic, we cannot sweep such evidence under the rug.”
Saving America and election integrity: 3rd in a series Read More »
Now, if these characters don’t understand even the fundamentals of their jobs, how can we expect them to know enough to govern health care? Or education? Or the environment? Or defense, commerce, or any of the other activities they purport to regulate?
Saving America and election Integrity: 2nd in a series Read More »
“[T]he failure of the Trump legal team and its allies to understand the Constitution’s rules on presidential elections has cost them dearly. They have evidence of fraud and other election irregularities. But they have not used that evidence well.”
Sorry, Vice-President Pence can’t replace electors on his own Read More »
The most memorable opinion was written by Justice Gorsuch. In joining the majority, he reminded us that “Government is not free to disregard the First Amendment in times of crisis.”
Supreme Court curbs the COVID police Read More »
This case reflected an irony common these days: The majority the media calls “conservative” applying liberal precedent while the three most liberal justices argued against it!
New from the Supreme Court: A smashing victory for religious liberty Read More »
The [Electoral College] has protected us against highly fractured results and purely regional candidates in almost every election since 1824.
The new mainstream media tactic: Keep ‘em ignorant Read More »
At the close of every annual court term, commentators express surprise that so many of the court’s decisions over the previous year have been liberal. They never make the simple deduction that if the court is producing so many liberal decisions, then perhaps it is not “conservative” after all.
Even with Amy Coney Barrett, we don’t really have a conservative Supreme Court Read More »
[T]he “progressives” have lost the argument over constitutional meaning. And that is why they have pivoted to assail the document itself.
The Left’s War on the Constitution Read More »
If we were to cut the presidency down to constitutional size, it wouldn’t matter so much that on rare occasions the position’s occupant was not the popular vote winner.
The Electoral College: The target of politicians who would make things worse Read More »
Most people would recognize the right to travel as an inherent, natural right of free people, and the courts say that it is the Constitution. But is it really there?
The “right to travel” Read More »
“Here’s an important, but widely overlooked, feature: The document doesn’t grant power only to federal officials. It also confers power on persons and entities who are not part of the U.S. government at all.”
Civics 101: How to understand the Constitution Read More »
“… when Hamilton stated . . . that he believed electors would use “information and discernment,” that is not very good evidence that future electors did in fact use information and discernment. But it is quite good evidence that Hamilton and his readers believed the Constitution empowered electors to do so.”
A defense of the Electoral College Read More »